Ultimate Longevity Bible

Comparison

GrimAge vs PhenoAge vs DunedinPACE

Last updated 2026-07-02· Last reviewed 2026-07-02· 1 min read

Reviewed by the Ultimate Longevity Bible editorial team. Educational reference — not medical advice. See disclaimer.

What each clock measures

  • Horvath 2013 (original): chronological age from methylation; not specific to health outcomes.
  • PhenoAge: methylation-based estimator of biomarker-derived biological age; mortality prediction.
  • GrimAge: methylation-based estimator of plasma proteins + smoking-pack-years, trained on time-to-death; strong mortality prediction.
  • DunedinPACE: methylation-based estimator of how fast a person is aging now — trained on the Dunedin cohort's longitudinal decline in 19 markers.

Which for which purpose

  • Mortality-risk stratification: GrimAge.
  • Overall biological age: PhenoAge or GrimAge.
  • Intervention monitoring ("did this rapamycin protocol slow my aging pace?"): DunedinPACE.
  • Research on aging biology: often all three, plus original Horvath.

Practical caveats

  • Assay noise is meaningful; single measurements should be interpreted cautiously.
  • Trend over multiple measurements is more informative than a single time-point.
  • Not clinically validated for treatment decisions.

More on this topic

Related entries

Epigenetic clocks, GlycanAge, Pace of aging, Steve Horvath.

More comparisons