Comparison
GrimAge vs PhenoAge vs DunedinPACE
Last updated 2026-07-02· Last reviewed 2026-07-02· 1 min read
Reviewed by the Ultimate Longevity Bible editorial team. Educational reference — not medical advice. See disclaimer.
What each clock measures
- Horvath 2013 (original): chronological age from methylation; not specific to health outcomes.
- PhenoAge: methylation-based estimator of biomarker-derived biological age; mortality prediction.
- GrimAge: methylation-based estimator of plasma proteins + smoking-pack-years, trained on time-to-death; strong mortality prediction.
- DunedinPACE: methylation-based estimator of how fast a person is aging now — trained on the Dunedin cohort's longitudinal decline in 19 markers.
Which for which purpose
- Mortality-risk stratification: GrimAge.
- Overall biological age: PhenoAge or GrimAge.
- Intervention monitoring ("did this rapamycin protocol slow my aging pace?"): DunedinPACE.
- Research on aging biology: often all three, plus original Horvath.
Practical caveats
- Assay noise is meaningful; single measurements should be interpreted cautiously.
- Trend over multiple measurements is more informative than a single time-point.
- Not clinically validated for treatment decisions.
- GrimAge vs DunedinPACE — Comparison.
- PhenoAge — Biomarker.
- Daniel Belsky — Researcher.
- Morgan Levine — Researcher.